点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
中国“Z世代”助浴师“出师” 解“银发族”难言之痛******
中新网济南2月4日电 (李明芮)准备血压计、血氧仪，组装浴缸，铺上防水垫，对浴缸进行消毒，调试水温……2月4日，一系列准备工作就绪后，济南“00后”助浴师张慧和同事一起将行动不便的老人抱进浴缸里，开始助浴服务。
随着中国老龄人口增多，助浴服务受到社会关注。中国国家卫生健康委员会数据显示，截至2021年底，中国60岁及以上老年人口达2.67亿，65岁及以上老年人口达2亿以上。
张慧和同事一起为老人进行助浴服务。 受访者供图在上述背景下，专为老年人提供洗浴服务的“助浴师”一职应运而生，北京、上海、江苏、山东等省市的部分地方逐渐兴起助浴服务。值得注意的是，近几年，这一新兴职业群体出现了越来越多的“Z世代”面孔，助解“银发族”养老“痛点”。
今年22岁的张慧是济南春和善养老服务有限公司的助浴师，从业半年来，已服务百余位老人。在她看来，为老人助浴是一件很有意义的事，“‘助浴’不仅可以帮助老人洗去身体上的不适，还能帮助老人获得心灵上的放松。”
“小张，你下次什么时候过来呀？”这是张慧每次工作后听到最多的一句话。张慧说，每次看到服务的老人及其家属充满感激的眼神，以及洗完澡后老人舒服的样子，就有满满的成就感，这也是她坚持做这份工作的动力。
济南春和善养老服务有限公司的创始人曹帅是一位“90后”，他以自身经历为例介绍说，洗澡，对年轻人来说是一件平常的小事，但却是许多老人心中的难言之痛。他80多岁的爷爷由于疾病卧床，陷入半失能状态，曾一度为洗澡问题困扰。“许多失能或者半失能老人疾病缠身，洗澡造成的心理波动或者其他状况，容易刺激到老人，导致意外事故的发生。这就需要更专业、更年轻的人来帮忙解决问题。”
“‘助浴’可以通过为老人服务，增加粘性，逐渐通过‘助浴’延伸到老人家里的情感交流、精神慰藉等领域。”曹帅称，自己在从事这一行业前，了解到日本有“访问助浴”，并向日本的一家助浴公司学习经验，将其转化为适合国人的助浴服务。“公司的员工也趋于年轻化，并在上岗前经过系统的培训，能更好地为老人服务。”
张慧和同事一起为老人进行助浴服务。 受访者供图2022年，中国国务院印发《“十四五”国家老龄事业发展和养老服务体系规划》，明确指出应支持社区助浴点、流动助浴车、入户助浴等多种业态发展，以及推动助浴服务相关产品的研发。
某电商平台发布数据显示，2021年“老人助浴”“老人洗澡”等关键词搜索量同比增长808.06%，“老人助浴”订单量同比增长1450%。
“让老人干净而体面地老去，市场力量不能缺席，更离不开家庭成员的呵护，社会养老制度的关怀和传统观念的转变。”曹帅坦言，除了帮老人“澡”回尊严、“澡”回幸福，还能做的事情有很多，希望有越来越多的人关注并参与到养老服务工作中。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)